# The Paradox of the Heap

A Sorites paradox is

a key issue in the philosophy of language, with the word “Sorites”

translating in Greek to “heap.” The paradox can be stated in two

premises, 1) A heap of sand is comprised of a large collection of

grains, and 2) A heap of sand minus one grain is still a heap. The

problem is that if you continue executing premise 2, you’ll soon have

neither heap nor even one sand grain left. The many possible resolutions

to this problem suggest a cache of ways philosophers try to deal with

problems of vagueness. Some

resolutions trivialize the problem, casting “heap” as a basically

meaningless term. Others try to set limits, either fixed by number

(although what’s the difference between 9,999 grains and 10,001?) or

positional (a heap has sand grains supporting other sand grains off the

ground, multiple heaps cannot also belong to a single heap, etc.).

So-called “fuzzy” logic

allows not just for on and off positions (“heap” and “not-heap”) but

also a third position, “unsure,” which may be subdivided into

“mostly-heap,” “partly-heap,” etc. Other solutions may be as simple as

group consensus (the majority of people would call it a “heap”) or as

complex as hysteresis, which

suggests certain systems make it impossible to predict an output from a

given input and instead it must be taken into account whether the heap

in question started out as a heap, a desert, or a single grain of sand.

More on the wonderful podcast Philosophy

Bites.

© Copyright Rob Giampietro 2000–2017.